An Adaptive Proton FLASH Therapy Using Modularized Pin Ridge Filter

TL;DR

This paper introduces an adaptive proton FLASH therapy method using modularized pin ridge filters that recycles beam directions from initial plans, maintaining dose quality and FLASH effects while reducing planning adjustments.

Contribution

It presents a novel adaptive planning approach that reuses beam directions via modular filters, improving efficiency and preserving treatment quality in proton FLASH therapy.

Findings

Recycled 64.7% to 91.2% of beam directions across cases.

Restored plan quality on re-CT to levels comparable with initial plans.

Maintained FLASH effects and clinical goals in adaptive plans.

Abstract

In this paper, we proposed a method to optimize adaptive proton FLASH therapy (ADP FLASH) using modularized pin ridge filters (pRFs) by recycling module pins from the initial plan while reducing pRF adjustments in adaptive FLASH planning. Initially, single energy (250 MeV) FLASH pRF plans were created using pencil beam directions (PBDs) from initial IMPT plans on the planning CT (pCT). PBDs are classified as new/changed ($\Delta$E > > 5 MeV) or unchanged by comparing spot maps for targets between pCT and re-CT. We used an iterative least square regression model to identify recyclable PBDs with minimal relative changes to spot MU weighting. Two PBDs with the least square error were retrieved per iteration and added to the background plan, and the remaining PBDs were reoptimized for the adaptive plan in subsequent iterations. The method was validated on three liver SBRT cases (50 Gy in 5 fractions) by comparing various dosimetric parameters across initial pRF plans on pCT, reCT and the ADP FLASH pRF plans on reCT. V100 for initial pRF plans on pCT, reCT, and ADP FLASH pRF plans for the three cases were as follows: (93.7%, 89.2%, 91.4%), (93.5%, 60.2%, 91.7%), (97.3%, 69.9%, 98.8%). We observe a decline in plan quality when applying the initial pRF to the reCT, whereas the ADP FLASH pRF approach restores quality comparable to the initial pRF on the pCT. FLASH effect of the initial pRF and ADP pRF plans were evaluated with a dose and dose rate threshold of 1Gy and 40Gy/s, respectively, using the FLASH effectiveness model. The proposed method recycled 91.2%, 71%, and 64.7% of PBDs from initial pRF plans for the three cases while maintaining all clinical goals and preserving FLASH effects across all cases.