Privacy Preserving Properties of Vision Classifiers
Pirzada Suhail, Amit Sethi

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how different vision classifier architectures like MLPs, CNNs, and ViTs vary in their vulnerability to inversion attacks, revealing privacy risks and guiding design choices for secure models.
Contribution
It systematically compares privacy-preserving properties of diverse vision architectures against inversion attacks, highlighting architectural factors influencing privacy risks.
Findings
CNNs and ViTs are more vulnerable to inversion attacks than MLPs.
Architectural features like input representation affect privacy risks.
Trade-offs exist between model accuracy and privacy protection.
Abstract
Vision classifiers are often trained on proprietary datasets containing sensitive information, yet the models themselves are frequently shared openly under the privacy-preserving assumption. Although these models are assumed to protect sensitive information in their training data, the extent to which this assumption holds for different architectures remains unexplored. This assumption is challenged by inversion attacks which attempt to reconstruct training data from model weights, exposing significant privacy vulnerabilities. In this study, we systematically evaluate the privacy-preserving properties of vision classifiers across diverse architectures, including Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and Vision Transformers (ViTs). Using network inversion-based reconstruction techniques, we assess the extent to which these architectures memorize and reveal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFace and Expression Recognition · Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
