Retracted Citations and Self-citations in Retracted Publications: A Comparative Study of Plagiarism and Fake Peer Review

TL;DR

This study compares retracted citations in plagiarism and fake peer review cases, revealing differences in retraction trends, citation impacts, and identification speeds, highlighting issues in scientific literature integrity.

Contribution

It provides a comparative analysis of retracted citations in plagiarism and fake peer review, revealing their citation patterns, retraction dynamics, and implications for research integrity.

Findings

Plagiarism-related papers receive 2.5 times more citations.

Fake peer review cases are identified and retracted faster.

Retractions due to fake peer review fluctuate more over time.

Abstract

Retracted citations remain a significant concern in academia as they perpetuate misinformation and compromise the integrity of scientific literature despite their invalidation. To analyze the impact of retracted citations, we focused on two retraction categories: plagiarism and fake peer review. The data set was sourced from Scopus and the reasons for the retraction were mapped using the Retraction Watch database. The retraction trend shows a steady average growth in plagiarism cases of 1.2 times, while the fake peer review exhibits a fluctuating pattern with an average growth of 5.5 times. Although fewer papers are retracted in the plagiarism category compared to fake peer reviews, plagiarism-related papers receive 2.5 times more citations. Furthermore, the total number of retracted citations for plagiarized papers is 1.8 times higher than that for fake peer review papers. Within the plagiarism category, 46% of the retracted citations are due to plagiarism, while 53.6% of the retracted citations in the fake peer review category are attributed to the fake peer review. The results also suggest that fake peer review cases are identified and retracted more rapidly than plagiarism cases. Finally, self-citations constitute a small percentage of citations to retracted papers but are notably higher among citations that are later retracted in both the categories.