
TL;DR
This paper investigates how the structure of search spaces influences inference efficiency, revealing that uniform spaces favor larger knowledge bases while skewed distributions excel in smaller ones, guiding knowledge acquisition strategies.
Contribution
It introduces a model linking ground fact distribution to inference performance, providing insights for optimizing search space design in knowledge systems.
Findings
Uniform search spaces are better for large knowledge bases.
Skewed degree distributions improve performance in smaller KBs.
Structural analysis can guide fact acquisition in learning systems.
Abstract
What properties of a first-order search space support/hinder inference? What kinds of facts would be most effective to learn? Answering these questions is essential for understanding the dynamics of deductive reasoning and creating large-scale knowledge-based learning systems that support efficient inference. We address these questions by developing a model of how the distribution of ground facts affects inference performance in search spaces. Experiments suggest that uniform search spaces are suitable for larger KBs whereas search spaces with skewed degree distribution show better performance in smaller KBs. A sharp transition in Q/A performance is seen in some cases, suggesting that analysis of the structure of search spaces with existing knowledge should be used to guide the acquisition of new ground facts in learning systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChild and Animal Learning Development · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Language and cultural evolution
