
TL;DR
This paper explores the properties of ultrametric spaces derived from general metric spaces, showing Lipschitz continuity of the construction, and investigates the relationship between ultrametric and dotted connected spaces within the Gromov-Hausdorff framework.
Contribution
It extends the Lipschitz property of the ultrametric construction to all metric spaces and characterizes the inverse relationship between specific mappings involving ultrametric and dotted connected spaces.
Findings
The map $ extbf{U}$ is 1-Lipschitz for all metric spaces, not just bounded ones.
The mapping $ extbf{U}$ is inverse to the map $ extbf{ extit{ extPsi}}$, which preserves Gromov-Hausdorff distances.
Ultrametric spaces and dotted connected spaces cannot be close in Gromov-Hausdorff distance within the same class.
Abstract
In ``Characterization, stability and convergence of hierarchical clustering methods'' by G. E. Carlsson, F. Memoli, the natural way to construct an ultrametric space from a given metric space was presented. It was shown that the corresponding map is -Lipschitz for every pair of bounded metric spaces, with respect to the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. We make a simple observation that is -Lipschitz for pairs of all, not necessarily bounded, metric spaces. We then study the properties of the mapping . We show that, for a given dotted connected metric space , the mapping from the proper class of all bounded ultrametric spaces ( is endowed with the Manhattan metric) preserves the Gromov-Hausdorff distance. Moreover, the mapping is inverse to . By a dotted connected metric space, we mean…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsadvanced mathematical theories
