A Theoretical Justification for Asymmetric Actor-Critic Algorithms
Gaspard Lambrechts, Damien Ernst, Aditya Mahajan

TL;DR
This paper provides a theoretical justification for asymmetric actor-critic algorithms in reinforcement learning, demonstrating how the asymmetric critic reduces errors and improves learning in partially observable environments with linear function approximators.
Contribution
It offers the first finite-time convergence analysis for asymmetric actor-critic algorithms, explaining their benefits in partially observable settings.
Findings
Asymmetric critic reduces aliasing errors in the agent state.
Finite-time bounds demonstrate improved convergence properties.
Theoretical insights support the use of asymmetric algorithms in practice.
Abstract
In reinforcement learning for partially observable environments, many successful algorithms have been developed within the asymmetric learning paradigm. This paradigm leverages additional state information available at training time for faster learning. Although the proposed learning objectives are usually theoretically sound, these methods still lack a precise theoretical justification for their potential benefits. We propose such a justification for asymmetric actor-critic algorithms with linear function approximators by adapting a finite-time convergence analysis to this setting. The resulting finite-time bound reveals that the asymmetric critic eliminates error terms arising from aliasing in the agent state.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Cellular Automata and Applications
