The Right to AI

TL;DR

This paper advocates for a 'Right to AI' emphasizing participatory governance, collective data ownership, and inclusive oversight to ensure AI systems serve societal interests and enhance democratic legitimacy.

Contribution

It introduces a novel four-tier model for the Right to AI, integrating participatory methodologies and critical analysis of current AI oversight challenges.

Findings

Grassroots participation can reduce bias and improve social responsiveness

Collective data management enhances fairness and transparency

Participatory approaches better balance efficiency and legitimacy

Abstract

This paper proposes a Right to AI, which asserts that individuals and communities should meaningfully participate in the development and governance of the AI systems that shape their lives. Motivated by the increasing deployment of AI in critical domains and inspired by Henri Lefebvre's concept of the Right to the City, we reconceptualize AI as a societal infrastructure, rather than merely a product of expert design. In this paper, we critically evaluate how generative agents, large-scale data extraction, and diverse cultural values bring new complexities to AI oversight. The paper proposes that grassroots participatory methodologies can mitigate biased outcomes and enhance social responsiveness. It asserts that data is socially produced and should be managed and owned collectively. Drawing on Sherry Arnstein's Ladder of Citizen Participation and analyzing nine case studies, the paper develops a four-tier model for the Right to AI that situates the current paradigm and envisions an aspirational future. It proposes recommendations for inclusive data ownership, transparent design processes, and stakeholder-driven oversight. We also discuss market-led and state-centric alternatives and argue that participatory approaches offer a better balance between technical efficiency and democratic legitimacy.