Linear-time classical approximate optimization of cubic-lattice classical spin glasses
Adil A. Gangat

TL;DR
This paper shows that simple, linear-time classical algorithms can reach optimality gaps comparable to more complex methods, providing benchmarks for identifying quantum speedups in optimizing cubic-lattice spin glasses.
Contribution
It demonstrates that classical meta-heuristics with linear-time complexity can serve as upper bounds for optimality gaps, guiding quantum speedup searches.
Findings
Linear-time classical heuristics reach large optimality gaps.
Super-linear scaling observed in simulated annealing and parallel tempering.
Classical heuristics can set upper bounds for quantum speedup ranges.
Abstract
Demonstrating quantum speedup for approximate optimization of classical spin glasses is of current interest. Such a demonstration must be done with respect to the best-known scaling of classical heuristics at a given optimality gap of a given problem. For cubic-lattice classical Ising spin glasses, recent theoretical and experimental developments open the possibility of showing quantum speedup for approximate optimization with quantum annealing. It is therefore desirable to understand the optimality-gap range over which such a speedup should be searched for. Here we show that on cubic-lattice tile-planting models, classical meta-heuristics that are linear-time by construction can reach optimality gaps at which simulated annealing and parallel tempering exhibit super-linear scaling. This implies that the optimality gaps achieved by linear-time classical meta-heuristics can serve as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
