Nonparametric methods controlling the median of the false discovery proportion
Jesse Hemerik

TL;DR
This paper introduces a nonparametric multiple testing method that effectively controls the median false discovery proportion, especially useful when most hypotheses are expected to be false, with broad applicability beyond safety testing.
Contribution
It proposes a novel nonparametric approach for controlling the median FDP that is valid under dependence and applicable to various parameters, improving power in specific testing scenarios.
Findings
Method controls the median of the FDP in finite samples.
Approach is valid under dependence among test statistics.
Often has superior power with one-sided tests.
Abstract
When testing many hypotheses, often we do not have strong expectations about the directions of the effects. In some situations however, the alternative hypotheses are that the parameters lie in a certain direction or interval, and it is in fact expected that most hypotheses are false. This is often the case when researchers perform multiple noninferiority or equivalence tests, e.g. when testing food safety with metabolite data. The goal is then to use data to corroborate the expectation that most hypotheses are false. We propose a nonparametric multiple testing approach that is powerful in such situations. If the user's expectations are wrong, our approach will still be valid but have low power. Of course all multiple testing methods become more powerful when appropriate one-sided instead of two-sided tests are used, but our approach often has superior power then. The proposed methods…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · Data Analysis with R
