Dosimetric impact of real-time re-optimization of proton pencil-beam scanning for moving targets

TL;DR

This study investigates a real-time adaptive re-optimization framework for proton pencil-beam scanning that responds to patient breathing motion, significantly improving target coverage and dose consistency in moving tumor treatments.

Contribution

It introduces a novel real-time re-optimization method based on receding horizon control for PBS, enhancing dosimetric outcomes compared to non-adaptive approaches.

Findings

Improved target coverage in worst-case breathing scenarios.

Reduced dose variation and increased dose conformity.

Maintained target homogeneity and sparing of organs at risk.

Abstract

When treating moving tumors, the precise delivery of proton therapy by pencil beam scanning (PBS) is challenged by the interplay effect. Although several 4D-optimization methods have been proposed, what is the most beneficial motion management technique is still an open question. In this study, we wish to investigate the dosimetric impact of re-optimizing the PBS spot weights during the treatment delivery in response to, and in anticipation of, variations in the patient's breathing pattern. We simulate for PBS the implementation of a real-time adaptive framework based on principles from receding horizon control. We consider the patient motion as characterized by a one-dimensional amplitude signal and a 4DCT, to simulate breathing of variable frequency. The framework tracks the signal and predicts the future motion with uncertainty increasing with the length of the prediction horizon. After each delivered energy layer, the framework re-optimizes the spot weights of the next layer based on the delivered dose and the predicted motion. For three lung patients, we generate 500 variable breathing patterns to evaluate the dosimetric results of the framework and compare them to those of implementations of previously proposed non-adaptive methods. Compared to the best non-adaptive method, the adaptive framework improves the CTV D98 in the near-worst breathing scenario (5th percentile), from 96.4 to 98.9 % of the prescribed dose and considerably reduces the variation as measured by a mean decrease in the inter-quartile range by more than 80 %. The target coverage improvements are achieved without generally compromising target dose homogeneity or OAR dose. The study indicates that a motion-adaptive approach based on re-optimization of spot weights during delivery has the potential to substantially improve the dosimetric performance of PBS given fast and accurate models of patient motion.