Pair Wavefunction Symmetry in UTe2 from Zero-Energy Surface State Visualization
Qiangqiang Gu, Shuqiu Wang, Joseph P. Carroll, Kuanysh Zhussupbekov, Christopher Broyles, Sheng Ran, Nicholas P. Butch, Shanta Saha, Johnpierre Paglione, Xiaolong Liu, J.C. S\'eamus Davis, Dung-Hai Lee

TL;DR
This study uses surface state visualization to investigate the superconducting order parameter in UTe2, providing evidence that it is a non-chiral state, likely B3u, through zero-energy Andreev tunneling observations.
Contribution
It demonstrates the use of zero-energy surface state imaging and Andreev tunneling to identify the symmetry of the superconducting order parameter in UTe2.
Findings
Zero-energy Andreev conductance observed at UTe2 surface.
Surface imaging indicates non-chiral superconducting state.
Most consistent state is B3u based on scattering analysis.
Abstract
Although nodal spin-triplet topological superconductivity appears probable in UTe2, its superconductive order-parameter remains unestablished. In theory, a distinctive identifier would be the existence of a superconductive topological surface band (TSB), which could facilitate zero-energy Andreev tunneling to an s-wave superconductor, and also distinguish a chiral from non-chiral via enhanced s-wave proximity. Here we employ s-wave superconductive scan-tips and detect intense zero-energy Andreev conductance at the UTe2 (0-11) termination surface. Imaging reveals sub-gap quasiparticle scattering interference signatures with a-axis orientation. The observed zero-energy Andreev peak splitting with enhanced s-wave proximity, signifies that of UTe2 is a non-chiral state: B1u, B2u or B3u. However, if the quasiparticle scattering along the a-axis is internodal,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
