Runtime Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithms for Multi-party Multi-objective Optimization
Yuetong Sun, Peilan Xu, Wenjian Luo

TL;DR
This paper provides a theoretical analysis of evolutionary algorithms for multi-party multi-objective optimization, highlighting inefficiencies of traditional methods and proposing new algorithms with improved runtime and solution consensus.
Contribution
It introduces the first theoretical runtime analysis for bi-party multi-objective problems and proposes novel EMPMO algorithms for pseudo-Boolean and shortest path problems.
Findings
Traditional algorithms are inefficient for MPMOPs.
Proposed EMPMO algorithms outperform previous methods.
Consensus-based EMPMO achieves better efficiency and accuracy.
Abstract
In scenarios where multiple decision-makers operate within a common decision space, each focusing on their own multi-objective optimization problem (e.g., bargaining games), the problem can be modeled as a multi-party multi-objective optimization problem (MPMOP). While numerous evolutionary algorithms have been proposed to solve MPMOPs, most results remain empirical. This paper presents the first theoretical analysis of the expected runtime of evolutionary algorithms on bi-party multi-objective optimization problems (BPMOPs). Our findings demonstrate that employing traditional multi-objective optimization algorithms to solve MPMOPs is both time-consuming and inefficient, as the resulting population contains many solutions that fail to achieve consensus among decision-makers. An alternative approach involves decision-makers individually solving their respective optimization problems and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
