The Shiny Scary Future of Automated Research Synthesis in HCI
Katja Rogers

TL;DR
This paper discusses the potential and risks of using automated tools like LLMs in research synthesis within HCI, emphasizing the need for caution to preserve human judgment.
Contribution
It highlights the opportunities and challenges of integrating automation in research synthesis, advocating for careful application to maintain research quality.
Findings
Automation can save time in research synthesis
Caution is needed to preserve human judgment
Automated tools may impact research quality
Abstract
Automation and semi-automation through computational tools like LLMs are also making their way to deployment in research synthesis and secondary research, such as systematic reviews. In some steps of research synthesis, this has the opportunity to provide substantial benefits by saving time that previously was spent on repetitive tasks. The screening stages in particular may benefit from carefully vetted computational support. However, this position paper argues for additional caution when bringing in such tools to the analysis and synthesis phases, where human judgement and expertise should be paramount throughout the process.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management
