
TL;DR
This paper explores how integrating human cognitive architectures, including System 1 and System 2 processes, can enable service robots to adapt, generalize, and self-monitor in complex, real-world environments.
Contribution
It proposes a framework for developing conscious service robots by incorporating causal reasoning, working memory, planning, and metacognition inspired by human cognition.
Findings
Humans adapt quickly due to cognitive architecture features.
Incorporating causal models and metacognition enhances robot flexibility.
Self-monitoring reduces errors and improves safety in robots.
Abstract
Deep learning's success in perception, natural language processing, etc. inspires hopes for advancements in autonomous robotics. However, real-world robotics face challenges like variability, high-dimensional state spaces, non-linear dependencies, and partial observability. A key issue is non-stationarity of robots, environments, and tasks, leading to performance drops with out-of-distribution data. Unlike current machine learning models, humans adapt quickly to changes and new tasks due to a cognitive architecture that enables systematic generalization and meta-cognition. Human brain's System 1 handles routine tasks unconsciously, while System 2 manages complex tasks consciously, facilitating flexible problem-solving and self-monitoring. For robots to achieve human-like learning and reasoning, they need to integrate causal models, working memory, planning, and metacognitive processing.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Robotics and Automated Systems
Methodstravel james
