Clustering of functional data prone to complex heteroscedastic measurement error
Andi Mai, Lan Xue, Roger Zoh, Carmen Tekwe

TL;DR
This paper develops and evaluates clustering methods for functional data affected by complex heteroscedastic measurement errors, demonstrating improved accuracy through error adjustment and flexible application across different clustering approaches.
Contribution
It introduces two-stage mixed-effects model-based methods to adjust for measurement errors before clustering functional data, addressing a gap in handling error-prone measurements.
Findings
Measurement error adjustment improves clustering accuracy.
The methods are robust across different initializations.
Application to real datasets demonstrates practical utility.
Abstract
Several factors make clustering of functional data challenging, including the infinite-dimensional space to which observations belong and the lack of a defined probability density function for the functional random variable. To overcome these barriers, researchers either assume that observations belong to a finite-dimensional space spanned by basis functions or apply nonparametric smoothing methods to the functions prior to clustering. Although extensive literature describes clustering methods for functional data, few studies have explored the clustering of measurement error--prone function-valued data. In this work, we consider clustering methods for functional data prone to complex, heteroscedastic measurement errors. Two stage-based methods using mixed-effects models are first applied to adjust for measurement error bias, followed by cluster analysis of the measurement…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research
