What is a Relevant Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Numerical Differentiation?
Shashank Verma, Mohammad Almuhaihi, and Dennis S. Bernstein

TL;DR
This paper challenges traditional signal-to-noise ratio measures in numerical differentiation, proposing a new SNR definition based on derivatives that better reflects the noise impact in sensor data processing.
Contribution
It introduces a novel SNR measure for numerical differentiation, demonstrating its effectiveness over traditional RMS-based SNR in relevant sensor data scenarios.
Findings
Traditional SNR is ineffective for numerical differentiation.
A new SNR based on derivatives is proposed and derived.
Implications for improved signal processing are discussed.
Abstract
In applications that involve sensor data, a useful measure of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is the ratio of the root-mean-squared (RMS) signal to the RMS sensor noise. The present paper shows that, for numerical differentiation, the traditional SNR is ineffective. In particular, it is shown that, for a harmonic signal with harmonic sensor noise, a natural and relevant SNR is given by the ratio of the RMS of the derivative of the signal to the RMS of the derivative of the sensor noise. For a harmonic signal with white sensor noise, an effective SNR is derived. Implications of these observations for signal processing are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStructural Health Monitoring Techniques · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
