Enhancing accuracy of uncertainty estimation in appearance-based gaze tracking with probabilistic evaluation and calibration
Qiaojie Zheng, Jiucai Zhang, Xiaoli Zhang

TL;DR
This paper improves the reliability of appearance-based gaze tracking by introducing a probabilistic evaluation metric and a calibration method to reduce bias in uncertainty estimates, validated on two datasets.
Contribution
It proposes a new evaluation metric for uncertainty assessment and a calibration strategy to enhance uncertainty estimation accuracy in gaze tracking models.
Findings
The evaluation metric effectively measures uncertainty quality.
Calibration reduces bias in uncertainty estimates.
Improved uncertainty estimation leads to more reliable gaze tracking.
Abstract
Accurately knowing uncertainties in appearance-based gaze tracking is critical for ensuring reliable downstream applications. Due to the lack of individual uncertainty labels, current uncertainty-aware approaches adopt probabilistic models to acquire uncertainties by following distributions in the training dataset. Without regulations, this approach lets the uncertainty model build biases and overfits the training data, leading to poor performance when deployed. We first presented a strict proper evaluation metric from the probabilistic perspective based on comparing the coverage probability between prediction and observation to provide quantitative evaluation for better assessment on the inferred uncertainties. We then proposed a correction strategy based on probability calibration to mitigate biases in the estimated uncertainties of the trained models. Finally, we demonstrated the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
MethodsHigh-Order Consensuses
