Overcoming Fairness Trade-offs via Pre-processing: A Causal Perspective
Charlotte Leininger, Simon Rittel, Ludwig Bothmann

TL;DR
This paper introduces a causal pre-processing approach to mitigate fairness trade-offs in machine learning, enabling models to achieve fairness and high accuracy simultaneously by approximating a hypothetical fair world.
Contribution
It provides a causal framework explaining fairness trade-offs and proposes practical pre-processing methods to approximate a fair world, improving fairness without sacrificing accuracy.
Findings
Pre-processing methods successfully approximate the FiND world.
Fairness and accuracy can be aligned through causal pre-processing.
Empirical results show resolution of traditional fairness trade-offs.
Abstract
Training machine learning models for fair decisions faces two key challenges: The \emph{fairness-accuracy trade-off} results from enforcing fairness which weakens its predictive performance in contrast to an unconstrained model. The incompatibility of different fairness metrics poses another trade-off -- also known as the \emph{impossibility theorem}. Recent work identifies the bias within the observed data as a possible root cause and shows that fairness and predictive performance are in fact in accord when predictive performance is measured on unbiased data. We offer a causal explanation for these findings using the framework of the FiND (fictitious and normatively desired) world, a "fair" world, where protected attributes have no causal effects on the target variable. We show theoretically that (i) classical fairness metrics deemed to be incompatible are naturally satisfied in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClimate Change Policy and Economics
