Automated NLO calculations for asymmetric hadron-hadron collisions in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO
Carlo Flore, Daniel Kiko{\l}a, Aleksander Kusina, Jean-Philippe, Lansberg, Olivier Mattelaer, Anton Safronov

TL;DR
This paper extends MadGraph5_aMC@NLO to automate next-to-leading order calculations for asymmetric hadron-hadron collisions, enabling precise cross section predictions and uncertainty assessments for diverse nuclear reactions.
Contribution
The authors developed and validated a new module in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO for asymmetric collisions, broadening its applicability to proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus interactions at NLO.
Findings
Validated the code with W and Z boson production in pPb collisions.
Provided cross sections and nuclear modification factors for various particles in pPb collisions.
Demonstrated the framework's capability with multiple collision processes at the LHC.
Abstract
We have extended {\tt MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO} capabilities by implementing computations for asymmetric hadron-hadron collisions, including proton-nucleus, pion-hadron or nucleus-nucleus collisions in order to obtain a tool for automated perturbative computations of cross sections (or ratios of cross sections) in asymmetric reactions at next-to-leading (NLO) order in in collinear factorisation. This tool, like the original symmetric version of \texttt{MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO}, automatically computes cross sections for different factorisation and renormalisation scales and PDFs provided by the {\tt LHAPDF} library, thereby allowing for an easy assessment of the associated theoretical uncertainties. In this paper, we present the validation of our code using and boson production in Pb collisions and Drell-Yan-pair production in collisions. We also illustrate the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
