Triple Instrumented Difference-in-Differences
Sho Miyaji

TL;DR
This paper introduces a formal framework for triple instrumented difference-in-differences (DID-IV), providing new estimands, assumptions, and methods for analyzing treatment effects with multiple instruments and staggered cases.
Contribution
It formalizes the triple DID-IV design, extends it to staggered instruments, and details practical estimation and inference methods.
Findings
Defines the triple Wald-DID estimand for local average treatment effects
Extends the design to staggered instrument cases
Provides practical estimation and inference procedures
Abstract
In this paper, we formalize a triple instrumented difference-in-differences (DID-IV). In this design, a triple Wald-DID estimand, which divides the difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) estimand of the outcome by the DDD estimand of the treatment, captures the local average treatment effect on the treated. The identifying assumptions mainly comprise a monotonicity assumption, and the common acceleration assumptions in the treatment and the outcome. We extend the canonical triple DID-IV design to staggered instrument cases. We also describe the estimation and inference in this design in practice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
