Human-Alignment Influences the Utility of AI-assisted Decision Making
Nina L. Corvelo Benz, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez

TL;DR
This study empirically demonstrates that higher alignment between AI confidence values and human confidence improves the utility of AI-assisted decision making, with post-processing further enhancing this effect.
Contribution
It provides large-scale empirical evidence linking AI-human confidence alignment to decision-making utility and shows that multicalibration of AI confidence values enhances this alignment.
Findings
Higher alignment correlates with increased decision-making utility.
Post-processing AI confidence to achieve multicalibration improves alignment.
Enhanced alignment leads to better AI-assisted decision outcomes.
Abstract
Whenever an AI model is used to predict a relevant (binary) outcome in AI-assisted decision making, it is widely agreed that, together with each prediction, the model should provide an AI confidence value. However, it has been unclear why decision makers have often difficulties to develop a good sense on when to trust a prediction using AI confidence values. Very recently, Corvelo Benz and Gomez Rodriguez have argued that, for rational decision makers, the utility of AI-assisted decision making is inherently bounded by the degree of alignment between the AI confidence values and the decision maker's confidence on their own predictions. In this work, we empirically investigate to what extent the degree of alignment actually influences the utility of AI-assisted decision making. To this end, we design and run a large-scale human subject study (n=703) where participants solve a simple…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
