Ab initio modeling of nonequilibrium dynamics in superconducting detectors and qubits
Alejandro Simon, Reed Foster, Mihir Sahoo, James Shi, Emma Batson, Francesca Incalza, Matteo Castellani, Owen Medeiros, Christoph Heil, Karl K. Berggren

TL;DR
This paper presents an ab initio model combining kinetic equations and density functional theory to simulate nonequilibrium quasiparticle and phonon dynamics in superconducting devices, aiding in device optimization and understanding material effects.
Contribution
It introduces a first-principles modeling framework for superconducting device dynamics, integrating ab initio materials data with nonequilibrium superconductivity theory.
Findings
NbN is suitable for single-photon detection.
Ta transmon qubits show reduced QP poisoning, enhancing coherence.
The model predicts device behavior without experimental input.
Abstract
Nonequilibrium quasiparticle (QP) and phonon dynamics are central to the operation of superconducting devices. Superconducting detectors, such as the superconducting nanowire single-photon detector, perform best when a large QP population is generated in response to small perturbations. Conversely, for superconducting qubits and topologically protected Majorana fermions, even relatively small QP densities can lead to significant performance degradation, and thus, ideal materials are less susceptible to QP poisoning. However, existing models of these devices lack a rigorous description of the QP and phonon dynamics, relying on approximations and phenomenology. In this article, we combine kinetic equations with density functional theory to model the nonequilibrium dynamics of a superconducting film ab initio. To demonstrate the universality of our model, we illustrate two examples: (1) we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
