Critical evaluations of different implementations of Edwards volume ensemble
Houfei Yuan, Yujie Wang

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates various implementations of Edwards' volume ensemble in granular systems, comparing experimental data and theoretical models to clarify the effective temperature concept and its practical applications.
Contribution
It systematically compares different methods for determining compactivity, clarifies discrepancies, and introduces the effective temperature Chi_f for topological excitations in granular packings.
Findings
Heat capacity and histogram methods yield consistent Chi values.
Discrepancies mainly due to reference states and microstate definitions.
Chi_f better describes topological excitations but is a quasi-equilibrium measure.
Abstract
Granular systems can display reproducible microscopic distributions governed by a few macroscopic parameters, parallel to equilibrium statistical mechanics. Building on this analogy, Edwards' s pioneering framework proposes a volume ensemble of equiprobable jammed states, introducing compactivity chi as an effective temperature. Despite its promise, debates persist regarding the framework' s formulation and validity, with practical implementation often exposing inconsistencies. This study systematically examines different implementations using experimental data from spherical particle packings with varying friction coefficients, subjected to tapping and shearing. Our findings show that the heat capacity and overlapping histogram methods yield consistent Chi values. Discrepancies in other approaches, such as the free volume model, primarily stem from differing reference-state…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
