Mutations and (Non-)Euclideaness in oriented matroids
Michael Wilhelmi

TL;DR
This paper explores the properties of oriented matroids related to Euclidean extensions, mutations, and non-Euclidean examples, providing new classifications, bounds, and examples for these mathematical structures.
Contribution
It introduces the classes Mandel and Las Vergnas of oriented matroids, establishes proper inclusions among various classes, and provides explicit examples and bounds for mutations and Euclidean properties.
Findings
All class inclusions are proper, with explicit proofs and examples.
For realizable hyperplane arrangements, L equals the rank, confirming Shannon's result.
Euclidean oriented matroids require at least three mutations to reach non-Euclidean ones.
Abstract
We call an oriented matroid Mandel if it has an extension in general position which makes all programs with that extension Euclidean. If is the minimum number of mutations adjacent to an element of the groundset, we call an oriented matroid Las Vergnas if . If is the class of oriented matroids having a certain property, it holds All these inclusions are proper, we give explicit proofs/examples for the parts of this chain that were not known. For realizable hyperplane arrangements of rank we have which was proved by Shannon. Under the assumption that a (modified) intersection property holds we give an analogon to Shannons proof and show that uniform rank …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Data Management and Algorithms
