Are Traditional Deep Learning Model Approaches as Effective as a Retinal-Specific Foundation Model for Ocular and Systemic Disease Detection?
Samantha Min Er Yew, Xiaofeng Lei, Jocelyn Hui Lin Goh, Yibing Chen,, Sahana Srinivasan, Miao-li Chee, Krithi Pushpanathan, Ke Zou, Qingshan Hou,, Zhi Da Soh, Cancan Xue, Marco Chak Yan Yu, Charumathi Sabanayagam, E Shyong, Tai, Xueling Sim, Yaxing Wang, Jost B. Jonas

TL;DR
This study compares a retina-specific foundation model (RETFound) with traditional deep learning models for disease detection, finding RETFound excels in systemic disease detection with small datasets, while traditional models perform similarly on ocular diseases with large datasets.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison between RETFound and traditional DL models, highlighting the conditions under which each approach performs best.
Findings
RETFound outperforms traditional models in systemic disease detection with small datasets.
Traditional DL models are comparable to RETFound in ocular disease detection with large datasets.
RETFound shows potential advantages in data-scarce scenarios for systemic diseases.
Abstract
Background: RETFound, a self-supervised, retina-specific foundation model (FM), showed potential in downstream applications. However, its comparative performance with traditional deep learning (DL) models remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate RETFound against three ImageNet-pretrained supervised DL models (ResNet50, ViT-base, SwinV2) in detecting ocular and systemic diseases. Methods: We fine-tuned/trained RETFound and three DL models on full datasets, 50%, 20%, and fixed sample sizes (400, 200, 100 images, with half comprising disease cases; for each DR severity class, 100 and 50 cases were used. Fine-tuned models were tested internally using the SEED (53,090 images) and APTOS-2019 (3,672 images) datasets and externally validated on population-based (BES, CIEMS, SP2, UKBB) and open-source datasets (ODIR-5k, PAPILA, GAMMA, IDRiD, MESSIDOR-2). Model performance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRetinal Imaging and Analysis · Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases · Retinal and Optic Conditions
