TL;DR
This study investigates how motion fidelity in VR air taxi simulations affects user trust and interface design, revealing that higher motion cues can decrease trust and emphasizing personalized interfaces for Urban Air Mobility systems.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian optimization approach to optimize UAM interface trade-offs considering motion fidelity effects on user trust and acceptance.
Findings
Motion fidelity reduces user trust and acceptance.
Bayesian optimization effectively balances multiple interface objectives.
Personalized interfaces may be necessary for optimal UAM user experience.
Abstract
Automated Urban Air Mobility (UAM) can improve passenger transportation and reduce congestion, but its success depends on passenger trust. While initial research addresses passengers' information needs, questions remain about how to simulate air taxi flights and how these simulations impact users and interface requirements. We conducted a between-subjects study (N=40), examining the influence of motion fidelity in Virtual-Reality-simulated air taxi flights on user effects and interface design. Our study compared simulations with and without motion cues using a 3-Degrees-of-Freedom motion chair. Optimizing the interface design across six objectives, such as trust and mental demand, we used multi-objective Bayesian optimization to determine the most effective design trade-offs. Our results indicate that motion fidelity decreases users' trust, understanding, and acceptance, highlighting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
