Human services organizations and the responsible integration of AI: Considering ethics and contextualizing risk(s)
Brian E. Perron, Lauri Goldkind, Zia Qi, and Bryan G. Victor

TL;DR
This paper proposes a nuanced, risk-based framework for ethically integrating AI into human services organizations, emphasizing context-specific evaluation, responsible implementation, and empirical assessment to balance benefits and ethical concerns.
Contribution
It introduces a dimensional risk assessment approach tailored for AI in human services, moving beyond binary adoption models to consider context-specific ethical and practical factors.
Findings
Risk varies significantly with application context
Local large language models can support responsible AI use
Empirical evaluation starting with low-risk applications is recommended
Abstract
This paper examines the responsible integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in human services organizations (HSOs), proposing a nuanced framework for evaluating AI applications across multiple dimensions of risk. The authors argue that ethical concerns about AI deployment -- including professional judgment displacement, environmental impact, model bias, and data laborer exploitation -- vary significantly based on implementation context and specific use cases. They challenge the binary view of AI adoption, demonstrating how different applications present varying levels of risk that can often be effectively managed through careful implementation strategies. The paper highlights promising solutions, such as local large language models, that can facilitate responsible AI integration while addressing common ethical concerns. The authors propose a dimensional risk assessment approach that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
