How Well Do Supervised 3D Models Transfer to Medical Imaging Tasks?
Wenxuan Li, Alan Yuille, Zongwei Zhou

TL;DR
This paper introduces a large annotated 3D medical imaging dataset and demonstrates that supervised pre-training on this dataset significantly enhances transfer learning performance for 3D medical tasks, outperforming existing models.
Contribution
The creation of AbdomenAtlas 1.1 dataset with extensive annotations and the development of pre-trained models that improve transfer learning in 3D medical imaging.
Findings
Supervised models trained on AbdomenAtlas 1.1 outperform models trained on smaller datasets.
Transfer learning ability scales with dataset size and annotation quality.
Pre-trained models achieve better performance than existing pre-trained models regardless of pre-training methodology.
Abstract
The pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm has become prominent in transfer learning. For example, if the model is pre-trained on ImageNet and then fine-tuned to PASCAL, it can significantly outperform that trained on PASCAL from scratch. While ImageNet pre-training has shown enormous success, it is formed in 2D, and the learned features are for classification tasks; when transferring to more diverse tasks, like 3D image segmentation, its performance is inevitably compromised due to the deviation from the original ImageNet context. A significant challenge lies in the lack of large, annotated 3D datasets rivaling the scale of ImageNet for model pre-training. To overcome this challenge, we make two contributions. Firstly, we construct AbdomenAtlas 1.1 that comprises 9,262 three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) volumes with high-quality, per-voxel annotations of 25 anatomical structures…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2024 oral
I really enjoy reading this paper and the contribution it brings. First, the authors would release a large-scale volumetric segmentation dataset with unprecedented number of pixelwisely labeled ground truth. This dataset comes from some publically available dataset and self-constructed ones with semi-annotated tools and interactive segmentation with radiologists. Second, the paper concluded on the debate of whether self-supervised or supervised pre-training lead to better performance and data ef
I do not remark any major issue as the drawback of this paper.
- The dataset that the authors collected seems like it will be a valuable resource for researchers, particularly in medical imaging. The data can serve to train general-purpose 3D features and comes with annotations. - I do like the point that self-supervision has its limits and that there is a benefit to simply having large supervised data. This is particularly relevant with the current interest in the vision community on self-supervised learning representations. - Experiments are reasonable
- The title may be a little misleading. If I understood it correctly, the word "transfer" in the title is not referring to transfer learning in this case, but simply asking whether supervision is also good for 3D data as it has been for 2D data. When first reading the title, I thought you were exploring transferring 2D supervised models to 3D tasks. Others may also make that incorrect assumption. - The use of the word "ImageNet" in the dataset name may want to be reconsidered. Besides being a l
The authors collected over 9000 cases of publicly available and private 3D CT datasets, and manually corrected annotation errors, making it the largest dataset for multi-organ segmentation currently available.
1. The paper explores the transferability of supervised learning by combining multiple 3D CT segmentation datasets. Similar work has been done in various fields, such as training various tasks and data in computer vision, which has shown improved results across tasks. This paper incorporates 3D CT data and tasks, with the only difference being the collection of more publicly available and private data, without bringing new insights or technological innovations to the community. 2. The conclusion
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical Imaging and Analysis · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
