PAH Feature Ratios Around Stellar Clusters and Associations in 19 Nearby Galaxies
Daniel A. Dale, Gabrielle B. Graham, Ashley T. Barnes, Dalya Baron,, Frank Bigiel, M\'ed\'eric Boquien, Rupali Chandar, J\'er\'emy Chastenet, Ryan, Chown, Oleg V. Egorov, Simon C.O. Glover, Lindsey Hands, Kiana F. Henny, Remy, Indebetouw, Ralf S. Klessen, Kirsten L. Larson

TL;DR
This study compares observed PAH feature ratios in 19 nearby galaxies with theoretical models, revealing that PAH ratios are influenced by radiation field hardness and that small PAHs are destroyed in intense radiation regions.
Contribution
It provides the first extensive comparison of observed PAH feature ratios from JWST data with theoretical models across multiple galaxies, highlighting the impact of radiation fields on PAH properties.
Findings
Observed PAH ratios largely match theoretical models, especially those with ionized and larger PAHs.
Diffuse interstellar medium shows smaller PAH ratios compared to stellar clusters and associations.
PAH ratios are anti-correlated with radiation field hardness, indicating PAH processing or destruction.
Abstract
We present a comparison of observed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) feature ratios in 19 nearby galaxies with a grid of theoretical expectations for near- and mid-infrared dust emission. The PAH feature ratios are drawn from Cycle 1 JWST observations and are measured for 7224 stellar clusters and 29176 stellar associations for which we have robust ages and mass estimates from HST five-band photometry. Though there are galaxy-to-galaxy variations, the observed PAH feature ratios largely agree with the theoretical models, particularly those that are skewed toward more ionized and larger PAH size distributions. For each galaxy we also extract PAH feature ratios for 200 pc-wide circular regions in the diffuse interstellar medium, which serve as a non-cluster/association control sample. Compared to what we find for stellar clusters and associations, the 3.3um/7.7um and 3.3um/11.3um…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
