Resolving discrepancies in bang-time predictions for indirect-drive ICF experiments on the NIF: Insights from the Build-A-Hohlraum campaign
G. F. Swadling, W. A. Farmer, H. Chen, N. Aybar, M. S. Rubery, M. B. Schneider, D. A. Liedahl, N. C. Lemos, E. Tubman, J. S. Ross, D. E. Hinkel, O. L. Landen, M. D. Rosen, S. Rogers K. Newman, D. Yanagisawa, N. Roskopf, S. Vonhof, L. Aghaian, M. Mauldin, B. L. Reichelt

TL;DR
This paper investigates the persistent discrepancy between measured and simulated x-ray drive in NIF ICF experiments, identifying errors in NLTE emission modeling as a key factor and proposing opacity adjustments to improve predictions.
Contribution
It provides new evidence that NLTE emission modeling errors significantly contribute to drive discrepancies and suggests specific opacity modifications to improve simulation accuracy.
Findings
Measured bang-times are 400-700 ps later than simulations.
X-ray emission in 2-4 keV is 30% lower than predicted.
Applying an opacity multiplier reduces the bang-time discrepancy from 300 ps to 100 ps.
Abstract
This study investigated discrepancies between measured and simulated x-ray drive in Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) hohlraums at the National Ignition Facility (NIF). Despite advances in radiation-hydrodynamic simulations, a consistent "drive deficit" remains. Experimentally measured ICF capsule bang-times are systematically 400-700 ps later than simulations predict. The Build-A-Hohlraum (BAH) campaign explored potential causes for this discrepancy by systematically varying hohlraum features, including laser entrance hole (LEH) windows, capsules, and gas fills. Overall, the agreement between simulated and experimental x-ray drive was found to be largely unaffected by these changes. The data allows us to exclude some hypotheses put forward to potentially explain the discrepancy. Errors in the local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) atomic modeling, errors in the modeling of LEH closure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpectroscopy and Laser Applications · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
