Thermodynamic properties of fcc lead: A scalar and fully relativistic first principle study
Balaram Thakur, Xuejun Gong, and Andrea Dal Corso

TL;DR
This study uses ab-initio methods to analyze the thermodynamic properties of face-centered cubic lead, examining the effects of spin-orbit coupling and exchange-correlation functionals on various physical properties.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive first-principles analysis of fcc lead's thermodynamic properties, including the influence of SOC and different exchange-correlation functionals, which was not extensively studied before.
Findings
Electronic excitations have negligible impact on thermodynamic properties.
Spin-orbit coupling effects decrease with increasing pressure but remain significant.
Results show SOC effects lead to differences from scalar relativistic calculations, with no consistent improvement in experimental agreement.
Abstract
This study investigates the thermodynamic properties of face-centered cubic lead (fcc-Pb) using ab-initio methods within the quasi-harmonic approximation (QHA), examining the influence of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and the exchange-correlation functionals. Two types of ultrasoft pseudopotential (US-PP) are considered: one that excludes (scalar relativistic PP) and one that includes the SOC effects (fully relativistic PP). Further, for each PP, we test the performance of three popular exchange-correlation functionals: Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation (PBE) (Perdew et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)), PBE modified for dense solids (PBEsol) (Perdew et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)), and local density approximation (LDA) (Perdew et al. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981)). We calculate the Helmholtz free energy, incorporating lattice vibrations (phonons) and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
