Position: Open and Closed Large Language Models in Healthcare
Jiawei Xu, Ying Ding, Yi Bu

TL;DR
This paper examines the roles of open-source and closed-source large language models in healthcare, highlighting their unique strengths, applications, and the community's response to their development.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of open and closed LLMs in healthcare, emphasizing their distinct applications and the scientific community's engagement with both types.
Findings
Closed LLMs excel in high-performance medical applications.
Open LLMs are favored for adaptability and cost-effectiveness.
Both types are shaping future healthcare AI research.
Abstract
This position paper analyzes the evolving roles of open-source and closed-source large language models (LLMs) in healthcare, emphasizing their distinct contributions and the scientific community's response to their development. Due to their advanced reasoning capabilities, closed LLMs, such as GPT-4, have dominated high-performance applications, particularly in medical imaging and multimodal diagnostics. Conversely, open LLMs, like Meta's LLaMA, have gained popularity for their adaptability and cost-effectiveness, enabling researchers to fine-tune models for specific domains, such as mental health and patient communication.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Data Quality and Management
