Consistent Beliefs without Common Prior
Ziv Hellman, Mikl\'os Pint\'er

TL;DR
This paper extends Morris's characterization of common priors with full support to infinite type spaces, demonstrating robustness across different probability models and questioning the meaningfulness of a single common prior.
Contribution
It generalizes Morris's finite-type results to infinite spaces and shows the robustness of the characterization across belief models.
Findings
Characterization extended to infinite type spaces
Robustness across countably and purely additive probabilities
Challenges the meaningfulness of a single common prior
Abstract
In a strand of the literature, it is assumed that the common prior has full support; that is, every type of every player is assigned positive probability. Morris (1991,1994) established an epistemological-behavioral duality characterisation of the common prior with full support, showing that a finite type space admits such a prior if and only if it contains no acceptable bet. This result forms the basis of the present paper. The paper makes three contributions: (1) The characterisation of Morris (1991,Morris1994) is extended to infinite type spaces. (2) The extension is robust: it does not depend on whether the infinite model applies countably additive or purely additive probabilities as beliefs. (3) The analysis implies that the notion of a real common prior-understood as a single probability distribution or a set of probability distributions-is not necessarily meaningful.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
