Chromatic Purity in Hermitian K-Theory at $p=2$
Jordan Levin

TL;DR
This paper explores the chromatic purity of L-theory at prime 2, demonstrating that L-theory does not exhibit chromatic redshift and establishing new connections between GW, L-theory, and chromatic localization.
Contribution
It introduces chromatic purity results for L-theory at p=2 using Poincaré categories and Hermitian trace methods, and proves a chromatic analogue of the homotopy limit problem for GW-theory.
Findings
L-theory does not exhibit chromatic redshift.
Higher chromatic vanishing of quadratic L-theory for idempotent complete categories.
Dependence of T(n+1)-local GW-theory on T(n+1)-local K-theory for rings with involution.
Abstract
In this article we investigate the question of chromatic purity of L-theory. To do so, we utilize the theory of additive GW and L-theory in the language of Poincar\'e categories as laid out in the series of papers by Calm\`es et al. We apply this theory to chromatically localised L-theory at the prime and recover the L-theoretic analogues of chromatic purity for -rings with involution. From this, we deduce that L-theory does not exhibit chromatic redshift. We deduce the higher chromatic vanishing of quadratic L-theory of arbitrary idempotent complete categories, thereby allowing the use of Hermitian trace methods to probe chromatic behaviour of GW and L-theory. Finally, we show that for -acyclic rings with involution, -local GW-theory depends only on -local K-theory and the associated duality, thereby proving a chromatic analogue of the homotopy limit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
