WALLABY Pilot Survey & ASymba: Comparing HI Detection Asymmetries to the SIMBA Simulation
Mathieu Perron-Cormier, Nathan Deg, Kristine Spekkens, Mark L. A., Richardson, Marcin Glowacki, Kyle A. Oman, Marc A. W. Verheijen, Nadine A. N., Hank, Sarah Blyth, Helga D\'enes, Jonghwan Rhee, Ahmed Elagali, Austin, Xiaofan Shen, Wasim Raja, Karen Lee-Waddell, Luca Cortese

TL;DR
This study compares atomic hydrogen asymmetries in observed WALLABY galaxy data with simulated data from the SIMBA model, developing a new method to reduce noise and analyzing the significance of asymmetry differences.
Contribution
It introduces a novel Scanline Tracing method for creating mock HI datacubes and provides the first comparison of HI asymmetries between WALLABY observations and SIMBA simulations.
Findings
High 3D asymmetries often indicate interactions or tidal features.
WALLABY shows a higher incidence of large asymmetries than SIMBA, but not significantly.
The statistical power of such comparisons will improve with more data and higher resolution.
Abstract
An avenue for understanding cosmological galaxy formation is to compare morphometric parameters in observations and simulations of galaxy assembly. In this second paper of the ASymba: Asymmetries of HI in SIMBA Galaxies series, we measure atomic gas HI asymmetries in spatially-resolved detections from the untargetted WALLABY survey, and compare them to realizations of WALLABY-like mock samples from the SIMBA cosmological simulations. We develop a Scanline Tracing method to create mock galaxy HI datacubes which minimizes shot noise along the spectral dimension compared to particle-based methods, and therefore spurious asymmetry contributions. We compute 1D and 3D asymmetries for spatially-resolved WALLABY Pilot Survey detections, and find that the highest 3D asymmetries A3D>0.5 stem from interacting systems or detections with strong bridges or tails. We then construct a series of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
