A robust measure of complexity
Egor Bronnikov, Elias Tsakas

TL;DR
This paper proposes a new belief-based complexity measure that accounts for both difficulty and ex ante uncertainty, providing a more comprehensive understanding of task complexity and effort required.
Contribution
It introduces a robust complexity measure based on belief and probability, fully characterizes the task order, and links optimal information acquisition to task complexity.
Findings
Complexity depends on difficulty and ex ante uncertainty.
For any optimally informed task, a more complex task requires less effort.
The measure characterizes the order of tasks based on success probabilities.
Abstract
We introduce a robust belief-based measure of complexity. The idea is that task A is deemed more complex than task B if the probability of solving A correctly is smaller than the probability of solving B correctly regardless of the reward. We fully characterize the corresponding order over the set of tasks. The main characteristic of this relation is that it depends, not only on difficulty (like most complexity definitions in the literature) but also on ex ante uncertainty. Finally, we show that for every task for which information is optimally acquired, there exists a more complex task which always induces less effort regardless of the reward.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDesign Education and Practice · Product Development and Customization
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
