Discovery of Spatter Constitutive Models in Additive Manufacturing Using Machine Learning

TL;DR

This paper presents a machine learning framework to predict melt pool characteristics and spatter in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, aiming to improve process stability and quality control.

Contribution

It introduces a novel ML-based approach with polynomial symbolic regression for modeling melt pool dynamics and spatter in AM, validated with experimental data.

Findings

ML models achieved over 95% R2 in predicting melt pool features.

ExtraTree model reached up to 96.7% R2 for melt pool prediction.

Logarithmic transformation improved spatter volume prediction accuracy.

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a rapidly evolving technology that has attracted applications across a wide range of fields due to its ability to fabricate complex geometries. However, one of the key challenges in AM is achieving consistent print quality. This inconsistency is often attributed to uncontrolled melt pool dynamics, partly caused by spatter which can lead to defects. Therefore, capturing and controlling the evolution of the melt pool is crucial for enhancing process stability and part quality. In this study, we developed a framework to support decision-making towards efficient AM process operations, capable of facilitating quality control and minimizing defects via machine learning (ML) and polynomial symbolic regression models. We implemented experimentally validated computational tools, specifically for laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) processes as a cost-effective approach to collect large datasets. For a dataset consisting of 281 varying process conditions, parameters such as melt pool dimensions (length, width, depth), melt pool geometry (area, volume), and volume indicated as spatter were extracted. Using machine learning (ML) and polynomial symbolic regression models, a high R2 of over 95 % was achieved in predicting the melt pool dimensions and geometry features on both the training and testing datasets, with either process conditions (power and velocity) or melt pool dimensions as the model inputs. In the case of volume indicated as spatter the value of the R2 improved after logarithmic transforming the model inputs, which were either the process conditions or the melt pool dimensions. Among the investigated ML models, the ExtraTree model achieved the highest R2 values of 96.7 % and 87.5 %.