Continuation methods as a tool for parameter inference in electrophysiology modeling
Matt J Owen, Gary R Mirams

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that continuation methods significantly improve the efficiency and robustness of parameter inference in electrophysiology models by reducing computation time and enabling advanced inference techniques.
Contribution
It introduces the application of continuation methods to electrophysiology modeling, showing they outperform traditional simulation approaches in parameter inference tasks.
Findings
Reduces parameter inference computation time by 70%.
Enables robust optimization through multiple starting points.
Facilitates advanced inference methods like MCMC.
Abstract
Parameterizing mathematical models of biological systems often requires fitting to stable periodic data. In cardiac electrophysiology this typically requires converging to a stable action potential through long simulations. We explore this problem through the theory of dynamical systems, bifurcation analysis and continuation methods; under which a converged action potential is a stable limit cycle. Various attempts have been made to improve the efficiency of identifying these limit cycles, with limited success. We demonstrate that continuation methods can more efficiently infer the converged action potential as proposed model parameter sets change during optimization or inference routines. In an example electrophysiology model this reduces parameter inference computation time by 70%. We also discuss theoretical considerations and limitations of continuation method use in place of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias · Fault Detection and Control Systems · ECG Monitoring and Analysis
