Evaluating Policy Effects through Opinion Dynamics and Network Sampling
Eugene T.Y. Ang, Yong Sheng Soh

TL;DR
This paper models how social interactions and network structures influence public opinion shifts on policies, using opinion dynamics and sampling methods to quantify the effects of discussion among populations.
Contribution
It introduces a framework to measure policy impact considering social dynamics and network topology, extending traditional static opinion models.
Findings
Opinion changes are significantly affected by network structure and discussion scope.
The Wasserstein distance effectively quantifies opinion shifts post-discussion.
Numerical analyses demonstrate the model's applicability to real-world networks.
Abstract
In the process of enacting or introducing a new policy, policymakers frequently consider the population's responses. These considerations are critical for effective governance. There are numerous methods to gauge the ground sentiment from a subset of the population; examples include surveys or listening to various feedback channels. Many conventional approaches implicitly assume that opinions are static; however, in reality, the population will discuss and debate these new policies among themselves, and reform new opinions in the process. In this paper, we pose the following questions: Can we quantify the effect of these social dynamics on the broader opinion towards a new policy? Given some information about the relationship network that underlies the population, how does overall opinion change post-discussion? We investigate three different settings in which the policy is revealed:…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsICT Impact and Policies
