Tidal Love Numbers of Neutron Stars in Horndeski Theories
Robin Fynn Diedrichs, Shinji Tsujikawa, Kent Yagi

TL;DR
This paper develops methods to compute tidal Love numbers of neutron stars within Horndeski scalar-tensor theories, revealing potential ambiguities and quantifying deviations from General Relativity that impact gravitational wave analysis.
Contribution
It derives linear perturbation equations for static tidal Love numbers in Horndeski theories and addresses ambiguities in their extraction, extending previous work to more general scalar-tensor models.
Findings
Tidal Love numbers are influenced by additional contributions beyond the asymptotic expansion.
In scalar-tensor theories, Love numbers can differ by up to 10% if extra contributions are ignored.
The paper provides a framework for accurate Love number calculation in alternative gravity theories.
Abstract
Precision measurements of the gravitational wave signal from compact binary inspirals allow us to constrain the internal structure of those objects via physical parameters such as the tidal Love numbers. In scalar-tensor theories, one typically finds new types of Love numbers that are usually not considered or simply absent in General Relativity, which further allows us to constrain deviations from General Relativity. Building upon previous results, we present the linear perturbation equations necessary to calculate static and even-parity tidal Love numbers in Horndeski theories, the most general scalar-tensor theories with second-order field equations of motion. We further focus on the quadrupolar Love numbers and demonstrate how these can be extracted from the asymptotic expansion of the perturbation fields. We find that there is a potential ambiguity in extracting the Love numbers in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
