Empirical Comparison of Four Stereoscopic Depth Sensing Cameras for Robotics Applications
Lukas Rustler, Vojtech Volprecht, Matej Hoffmann

TL;DR
This study empirically compares four stereoscopic RGB-D cameras across various scenarios, revealing their strengths and limitations for robotics applications, with detailed performance data available publicly.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive empirical evaluation of four stereoscopic depth cameras for robotics, highlighting their performance differences and suitability for various distances and applications.
Findings
D435 performs best up to 1 meter with under 1 cm error
ZED 2 maintains under 3 cm error at 4 meters
OAK-D Pro offers integrated AI modules
Abstract
Depth sensing is an essential technology in robotics and many other fields. Many depth sensing (or RGB-D) cameras are available on the market and selecting the best one for your application can be challenging. In this work, we tested four stereoscopic RGB-D cameras that sense the distance by using two images from slightly different views. We empirically compared four cameras (Intel RealSense D435, Intel RealSense D455, StereoLabs ZED 2, and Luxonis OAK-D Pro) in three scenarios: (i) planar surface perception, (ii) plastic doll perception, (iii) household object perception (YCB dataset). We recorded and evaluated more than 3,000 RGB-D frames for each camera. For table-top robotics scenarios with distance to objects up to one meter, the best performance is provided by the D435 camera that is able to perceive with an error under 1 cm in all of the tested scenarios. For longer distances,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
