Measurements of the Temperature and E-mode Polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background from the Full 500-square-degree SPTpol Dataset
T.-L. Chou, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, J. E. Austermann, L. Balkenhol, J. A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, H. C. Chiang, R. Citron, C. Corbett Moran, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan

TL;DR
This paper presents precise measurements of the CMB temperature and E-mode polarization from the full 500-square-degree SPTpol dataset, confirming consistency with the $ m{ extLambda CDM}$ model and providing the most sensitive data for the lensed CMB damping tail.
Contribution
First comprehensive analysis of the full SPTpol dataset across multiple frequency bands, providing high-precision CMB polarization spectra and cosmological parameter constraints.
Findings
Consistent $ m{ extLambda CDM}$ parameter estimates across data splits.
Most sensitive measurements of the lensed CMB damping tail to date.
Agreement with Planck results when including lensing parameter $A_L$.
Abstract
Using the full four-year SPTpol 500 deg dataset in both the 95 GHz and 150 GHz frequency bands, we present measurements of the temperature and -mode polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), as well as the -mode polarization auto-power spectrum () and temperature--mode cross-power spectrum () in the angular multipole range . We find the SPTpol dataset to be self-consistent, passing several internal consistency tests based on maps, frequency bands, bandpowers, and cosmological parameters. The full SPTpol dataset is well-fit by the model, for which we find km s Mpc and , when using only the SPTpol data and a Planck-based prior on the optical depth to reionization. The parameter constraints are consistent across the 95 GHz-only, 150 GHz-only, -only, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
