On the Reliability of Biometric Datasets: How Much Test Data Ensures Reliability?
Matin Fallahi, Ragini Ramesh, Pankaja Priya Ramasamy, Patricia Arias, Cabarcos, Thorsten Strufe, Philipp Terh\"orst

TL;DR
This paper introduces BioQuake, a new measure for estimating uncertainty in biometric verification systems, validated across multiple datasets and modalities, highlighting the importance of reliability in performance reporting.
Contribution
The paper presents BioQuake, a novel method for quantifying uncertainty in biometric system performance, and provides guidelines for more reliable reporting of error rates.
Findings
BioQuake effectively estimates uncertainty across diverse biometric modalities.
Reported performance often significantly deviates from actual error rates.
BioQuake is available as an accessible web tool for researchers.
Abstract
Biometric authentication is increasingly popular for its convenience and accuracy. However, while recent advancements focus on reducing errors and expanding modalities, the reliability of reported performance metrics often remains overlooked. Understanding reliability is critical, as it communicates how accurately reported error rates represent a system's actual performance, considering the uncertainty in error-rate estimates from test data. Currently, there is no widely accepted standard for reporting these uncertainties and indeed biometric studies rarely provide reliability estimates, limiting comparability and interpretation. To address this gap, we introduce BioQuake--a measure to estimate uncertainty in biometric verification systems--and empirically validate it on four systems and three datasets. Based on BioQuake, we provide simple guidelines for estimating performance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
