Accuracy versus Predominance: Reassessing the validity of the quasi-steady-state approximation
Kashvi Srivastava, Justin Eilertsen, Victoria Booth, Santiago Schnell

TL;DR
This paper reevaluates the conditions under which the standard quasi-steady-state approximation (QSSA) is valid for enzyme kinetics, emphasizing the importance of the enzyme to Van Slyke-Cullen constant ratio for accurate model reduction.
Contribution
It clarifies the biochemical conditions that determine the validity and predominance of the standard QSSA compared to other reductions, using ordinary differential equation analysis.
Findings
The ratio e₀/Kₘ indicates asymptotic accuracy of the standard QSSA.
Predominance of the standard QSSA depends on the smallness of e₀/K.
The magnitude of e₀/K is the most accurate measure of QSSA validity.
Abstract
The application of the standard quasi-steady-state approximation to the Michaelis--Menten reaction mechanism is a textbook example of biochemical model reduction, derived using singular perturbation theory. However, determining the specific biochemical conditions that dictate the validity of the standard quasi-steady-state approximation remains a challenging endeavor. Emerging research suggests that the accuracy of the standard quasi-steady-state approximation improves as the ratio of the initial enzyme concentration, , to the Michaelis constant, , decreases. In this work, we examine this ratio and its implications for the accuracy and validity of the standard quasi-steady-state approximation as compared to other quasi-steady-state reductions in its proximity. Using standard tools from the analysis of ordinary differential equations, we show that while provides an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
