A Comparative Study of Full Apps and Lite Apps for Android
Yutian Tang, Xiaojiang Du

TL;DR
This study compares full and lite Android apps, revealing that many lite versions do not meet their goals and pose security risks, highlighting the need for better design and security practices.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive comparison of lite and full Android apps, analyzing their similarities, differences, and associated security concerns.
Findings
Most lite apps do not achieve smaller size or faster download speeds.
Lite apps may introduce significant security vulnerabilities.
Many lite apps fail to meet their intended performance goals.
Abstract
App developers aim to create apps that cater to the needs of different types of users. This development approach, also known as the "one-size-fits-all" strategy, involves combining various functionalities into one app. However, this approach has drawbacks, such as lower conversion rates, slower download speed, larger attack surfaces, and lower update rates. To address these issues, developers have created "lite" versions to attract new users and enhance the user experience. Despite this, there has been no study conducted to examine the relationship between lite and full apps. To address this gap, we present a comparative study of lite apps, exploring the similarities and differences between lite and full apps from various perspectives. Our findings indicate that most existing lite apps fail to fulfill their intended goals (e.g., smaller in size, faster to download, and using less data).…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMobile and Web Applications
