MEt3R: Measuring Multi-View Consistency in Generated Images
Mohammad Asim, Christopher Wewer, Thomas Wimmer, Bernt Schiele, Jan Eric Lenssen

TL;DR
The paper introduces MEt3R, a new metric for evaluating multi-view consistency in generated images, enabling independent assessment of generated views without relying on scene-specific details.
Contribution
It proposes MEt3R, a novel, sampling-independent metric for measuring multi-view consistency in generated images, utilizing dense 3D reconstructions and feature map comparisons.
Findings
MEt3R effectively evaluates multi-view consistency across various generative models.
The metric reveals differences in consistency quality among existing methods.
It provides a new benchmark for assessing multi-view image generation quality.
Abstract
We introduce MEt3R, a metric for multi-view consistency in generated images. Large-scale generative models for multi-view image generation are rapidly advancing the field of 3D inference from sparse observations. However, due to the nature of generative modeling, traditional reconstruction metrics are not suitable to measure the quality of generated outputs and metrics that are independent of the sampling procedure are desperately needed. In this work, we specifically address the aspect of consistency between generated multi-view images, which can be evaluated independently of the specific scene. Our approach uses DUSt3R to obtain dense 3D reconstructions from image pairs in a feed-forward manner, which are used to warp image contents from one view into the other. Then, feature maps of these images are compared to obtain a similarity score that is invariant to view-dependent effects.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsDiffusion · Sparse Evolutionary Training
