Improved SED-Fitting Assumptions Result in Inside-Out Quenching at $z\sim0.5$ and Quenching at All Radii Simultaneously at $z\sim1$
Alexander de la Vega, Susan A. Kassin, Camilla Pacifici, Stephane, Charlot, Emma Curtis-Lake, Jacopo Chevallard, Timothy M. Heckman, Anton M., Koekemoer, Weichen Wang

TL;DR
This study shows that using more realistic priors in SED fitting reveals that galaxies at higher redshifts quench uniformly across all radii, while at lower redshifts they quench from the inside-out, challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
The paper introduces physically motivated priors in SED fitting, improving the accuracy of star formation and dust profiles, and revises the understanding of galaxy quenching patterns over cosmic time.
Findings
At $z ext{~}1.3$, galaxies quench uniformly across radii.
At $z ext{~}0.5$, galaxies quench from the inside-out.
Physically motivated priors improve SED fitting accuracy.
Abstract
Many studies conclude that galaxies quench from the inside-out by examining profiles of specific star-formation rate (sSFR). These are usually measured by fitting spectral energy distributions (SEDs) assuming a fixed dust law and uniform priors on all parameters. Here, we examine the effects of more physically motivated priors: a flexible dust law, an exponential prior on the dust attenuation , and Gaussian priors that favor extended star-formation histories. This results in model colors that better trace observations. We then perform radial SED fits to multiband flux profiles measured from Hubble Space Telescope images for 1,440 galaxies at of stellar masses using both the traditional and the more physically motivated assumptions. The latter results in star formation rate and profiles that agree with measurements from spectroscopy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
