Retrieval-Augmented Generation by Evidence Retroactivity in LLMs
Liang Xiao, Wen Dai, Shuai Chen, Bin Qin, Chongyang Shi, Haopeng Jing,, Tianyu Guo

TL;DR
RetroRAG introduces a retroactive reasoning framework for retrieval-augmented generation, enabling iterative evidence refinement and significantly improving answer accuracy in complex question answering tasks.
Contribution
It pioneers a retroactive reasoning paradigm that revises evidence and updates reasoning chains, advancing beyond traditional unidirectional retrieval methods.
Findings
RetroRAG outperforms existing methods in empirical evaluations.
The framework effectively refines evidence iteratively.
RetroRAG enhances reasoning accuracy in complex questions.
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation has gained significant attention due to its ability to integrate relevant external knowledge, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the LLMs' responses. Most of the existing methods apply a dynamic multiple retrieval-generating process, to address multi-hop complex questions by decomposing them into sub-problems. However, these methods rely on an unidirectional forward reasoning paradigm, where errors from insufficient reasoning steps or inherent flaws in current retrieval systems are irreversible, potentially derailing the entire reasoning chain. For the first time, this work introduces Retroactive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RetroRAG), a novel framework to build a retroactive reasoning paradigm. RetroRAG revises and updates the evidence, redirecting the reasoning chain to the correct direction. RetroRAG constructs an evidence-collation-discovery…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques
MethodsSoftmax · Attention Is All You Need
