Comparison Study: Glacier Calving Front Delineation in Synthetic Aperture Radar Images With Deep Learning
Nora Gourmelon, Konrad Heidler, Erik Loebel, Daniel Cheng, Julian Klink, Anda Dong, Fei Wu, Noah Maul, Moritz Koch, Marcel Dreier, Dakota Pyles, Thorsten Seehaus, Matthias Braun, Andreas Maier, Vincent Christlein

TL;DR
This paper benchmarks deep learning methods for glacier calving front delineation in SAR images, highlighting current error margins and the need for improved techniques compared to human annotators.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of deep learning systems versus human annotations for glacier front delineation in SAR imagery.
Findings
Deep learning systems have errors up to 221 m.
Human annotators deviate by only 38 m.
Further research is needed to improve automated delineation accuracy.
Abstract
Continuous monitoring of glacier calving fronts is essential for sea level rise projections. This study benchmarks Deep Learning systems for front delineation in Synthetic Aperture Radar imagery. While Deep Learning systems exhibit errors up to 221 m, human annotators deviate by only 38 m, underscoring the need for further research.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
