De-centering the (Traditional) User: Multistakeholder Evaluation of Recommender Systems

TL;DR

This paper discusses the challenges and considerations in evaluating multistakeholder recommender systems, emphasizing the importance of accounting for diverse stakeholder impacts beyond just end-user utility.

Contribution

It highlights the complexity of multistakeholder evaluation and offers practical guidance and use case examples for incorporating these considerations into system design and research.

Findings

Identifies key challenges in multistakeholder evaluation

Provides practical examples for implementation

Outlines future research directions

Abstract

Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, these systems cannot be evaluated strictly by the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the challenges of multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved -- from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limited to providers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. We discuss how to move from theoretical principles to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. We aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about incorporating these complex and domain-dependent issues of evaluation in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.